لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The main focus is within the intention to cause injury. This is really a major problem: an extremely very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of at some point from the registration of FIR which has not been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness with the alleged incidence as well as the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to get the real brothers of your deceased but they did not respond whatsoever for the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous events that extra judicial confession of an accused is usually a weak sort of evidence which can be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is usually relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light on the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners together with a motorcycle at 4.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines numerous criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the broader legal principles.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any potential adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to get crafted.
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a chance of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is place in its place.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
She did note that get more info the boy still needed in depth therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being safe with other children.” The boy was receiving counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved in the actions.
Additionally, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and a hundred and twenty of the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
Pakistan’s legal system just isn't without flaws: overhauling is overdue along with the law regarding murder demands serious reconsideration and clarification. For the time being, the least that can be done is to ensure that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.